Feb 17, 2016

Did Scalia Really Say That? "Citizens United" Lurks Behind Supreme Court's Latest Money-in-Politics Case | PR Watch

The 2010 Citizens United decision was premised on the dubious notion that expenditures made "independently" of candidates by groups like Super PACs are less likely to have a corruptive influence than direct contributions to candidates and parties. In Tuesday's oral arguments in McCutcheon v. FEC, the latest case to challenge campaign finance limits, at least some justices acknowledged the folly...

Proceed to the page: http://linkis.com/SvHyW

Similar Articles Added Earlier

Similar Articles Added Today

Latest Links Processed

0/120